Literacy with an Attitude- Educating Working Class Children in Their Own Self-Interest
By: Patrick J. Flinn
Reflection: This piece was truly an interesting and insightful read that piqued my curiosity. The main idea for chapter 2 suggests that schools in areas of certain social classes can set them up for that exact class in society. For example, in the working-class school the assignments students would where very mechanical and following instruction oriented, similarly to that field. Children of the middle class could learn techniques to perform well if they paid attention to their teacher and listened well. Which is related to how middle class workers are rewarded when they obey. Those in the affluent professional schools focused on individuality and creativity. It is designed for students to connect real life experiences to the content of the class. Instead of giving direct order, she had the students themselves choose how they behave. This approach differs from Delpit where she advocates for explicit instruction. I believe both ways can be beneficial depending on the circumstance. There is one example in particular I have given much thought into, including the use of cell phones in a classroom.
Chat gpt generated image:
Insert “can you create a photo with cell phones. have the teacher say, "when you are on your phone you can miss out on the lesson." have a student say "I need to send a quick text to my mom".”
In a high school setting, I have been pondering if you should have a strict no phone policy or give students the freedom to use it as they please. As a teacher, I would say you can use them, but you may miss out on something important. One of the key words in affluent professional schools was think. It takes no effort to think when you get yelled at or your phone taken away. However, it does take thinking and learning to go on your phone, miss a detail, and learn that you should pay attention to your teacher. It takes negotiation to tell the teacher, I need to text my mom back for one second, but I am listening and will put it back right away. I believe when we give students more creativity and trust in certain settings that learning can be proper. There are going to be specific classrooms that may take advantage of this and you may want to strictly enforce no cell phones to younger students when they are not ready to make such judgments yet. Negotiation, deep level thinking, and creativity is crucial in experimental scientific based jobs, which is setting them up for this career field. The last school they focused on was the elite executive school. There was focus on self-discipline and making good choices. In this school students had the freedom to move around and the responsibility to keep up with the brisk pace of the content. This school was pushing the students to be elite just like the career they are destined for. The end of this piece resonated with me when the author said “I’d like to hope that a child’s expectations are not determined the day he/she enters kindergarten.” After all, this is the land of opportunity so it is unfair that the school you go to can influence a certain career. Especially when you are born into the working class. Honestly, I have never thought of that relationship before, and it really opened my eyes to these hidden injustices.
Comment: A part in the piece that made me feel passionate was when the author mentioned that working class students were making a grid, but they did not know why. When you show students how to do everything, especially a certain way, it can be a barrier for learning. Students need to spend time struggling on their own in order to learn. School should not be so focused on the pace and the answers, but rather on the content understanding and creativity.